Skip to content

South Africa — Children's Act 38 of 2005 + Section 7 best-interest factors

TL;DR

South Africa's Children's Act 38 of 2005 (in force 1 Apr 2010) integrates Roman-Dutch common law, English law, indigenous African customary law, and the post-apartheid constitutional framework. Section 7 enumerates 14 best-interest factors. Section 28(2) of the Constitution makes child's best interest paramount in every matter concerning the child. Hague 1980 (1997). Hague 1996 signed but not ratified. Constitutional Court (ConCourt) jurisprudence framework includes Sonderup v Tondelli (2001) on Hague + S v M (2007) on parental imprisonment.

Constitutional foundation

Constitution of South Africa 1996 — Section 28

  • s.28(1): every child has the right to:
  • family or parental care or appropriate alternative care when removed from family environment
  • basic nutrition, shelter, basic health care, social services
  • protection from maltreatment, neglect, abuse, degradation
  • to be detained only as last resort and for shortest time, separately from non-children
  • s.28(2): child's best interests are of paramount importance in every matter concerning the child
  • Constitutional foundation makes s.28(2) override most competing considerations

Children's Act 38 of 2005 — Section 7 best-interest factors

Section 7 enumerates 14 factors for best-interest determination: 1. Nature of personal relationship with parents, family members, others 2. Attitude of parents/care-givers 3. Capacity of parents/care-givers to provide 4. Likely effect on child of change in care arrangement 5. Practical difficulty/expense of contact 6. Need for child to remain in care of parent/care-giver/family 7. Need for child to maintain connection with family, culture, language, religion 8. Child's age, maturity, stage of development, gender 9. Child's physical and emotional security 10. Child's intellectual, emotional, social, cultural development 11. Disability or chronic illness of child 12. Need for stable environment 13. Avoidance of subjecting child to maltreatment, abuse, neglect, exploitation 14. Which action minimises legal/administrative proceedings affecting child

Customary law integration

  • South African legal system explicitly integrates African customary law (Constitution s.211)
  • Recognition of Xhosa, Zulu, Sotho, Tswana, Venda customary frameworks
  • Bhe v Magistrate [2004] ZACC 17 — landmark on customary law and best interest

Constitutional Court (ConCourt) jurisprudence

Sonderup v Tondelli [2001] ZACC 9

  • Foundational Hague 1980 application in SA
  • Constitutional framework integrated with Hague framework

S v M [2007] ZACC 18

  • Best interest of child paramount even in criminal-sentencing of parents
  • Wide-ranging application of s.28(2)

AD v DW [2007] ZACC 27

  • International best-interest framework
  • Refusal of inter-country adoption application

Centre for Child Law v Director General [2024] ZACC

  • Recent application of constitutional framework
  • Procedural protections for children

Supreme Court of Appeal jurisprudence

F v F [2006] ZASCA 92

  • Welfare assessment in custody matters
  • Pre-Children's-Act doctrinal framework

V v V [2008] ZASCA

  • Application of Children's Act post-2010

Multiple post-2020 PA-citing cases in regional High Courts

Hague framework

  • Hague 1980: signatory since 1 Oct 1997; Department of Justice — Office of the Chief Family Advocate is CA
  • Hague 1996: signed but not yet ratified (pending)
  • Active corridors: UK (massive ZA-UK family-law caseload), USA, Australia, Botswana, Zimbabwe, Mozambique

Office of the Family Advocate

  • Statutory office providing court-appointed family-mediation services
  • Welfare investigations + reports
  • Free to families
  • Critical institution for South African family law

Parental alienation recognition

  • Children's Act s.7 best-interest framework permits PA evidence
  • ConCourt jurisprudence increasingly cites PA framework (post-2020)
  • South African Psychological Association published PA practitioner guidance 2022
  • Office of Family Advocate trains evaluators in PA assessment

Diaspora pattern

  • UK: substantial ZA-British community (~210k); active family-law corridor
  • Australia: ~200k
  • USA, Canada, NZ: substantial post-1994 emigration waves
  • SADC (Botswana, Namibia, Zimbabwe, Mozambique): regional cross-border

Citing posts

Post URL Relevance
https://www.antialienate.com/blog/parental-alienation-legal-frameworks-world SA constitutional best-interest framework
https://www.antialienate.com/blog/international-parental-alienation-cross-border-cases SA-UK family-court corridor

Sources

  • Constitution of South Africa 1996, s.28: https://www.gov.za/documents/constitution-republic-south-africa-1996
  • Children's Act 38 of 2005: https://www.gov.za/documents/childrens-act
  • Sonderup v Tondelli [2001] ZACC 9: https://www.saflii.org
  • S v M [2007] ZACC 18: https://www.saflii.org
  • HCCH South Africa: https://www.hcch.net/en/states/hcch-members/details1/?sid=87

By Alan Markson · CC BY 4.0 · Disclaimer: This entry is educational reference material and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified South African family lawyer for case-specific guidance.