Skip to content

ABGB §§ 159 + 187 — Wohlverhaltensgebot + Recht auf persönliche Kontakte (verbatim)

Jurisdiction: Austria · Citation: Allgemeines Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch §§ 159 + 187 · Authoritative source: ris.bka.gv.at

The dual statutory pillar of Austrian anti-PA law. § 159 ABGB is the Wohlverhaltensgebot (duty of cooperative conduct — the affirmative requirement to refrain from undermining the child's relationship with the other parent), the structural parallel to German § 1684 (2) BGB. § 187 ABGB is the Recht auf persönliche Kontakte (right to personal contact), the operational provision that translates the cooperative-conduct duty into a positively-stated child-and-parent contact entitlement. Together they form the statutory basis on which the Oberster Gerichtshof has developed Austrian Entfremdung (alienation) jurisprudence.

Verbatim text (current consolidated, KindNamRÄG-2013 numbering)

§ 159 ABGB — Wohlverhaltensgebot

Bei Ausübung der Rechte und Erfüllung der Pflichten nach diesem Hauptstück ist zur Wahrung des Kindeswohls alles zu unterlassen, was das Verhältnis des Minderjährigen zu anderen Personen, denen nach diesem Hauptstück das Kind betreffende Rechte und Pflichten zukommen, beeinträchtigt oder die Wahrnehmung von deren Aufgaben erschwert.

§ 187 ABGB — Recht auf persönliche Kontakte

(1) Das Kind und jeder Elternteil haben das Recht auf regelmäßige und den Bedürfnissen des Kindes entsprechende persönliche Kontakte. Die persönlichen Kontakte sollen einvernehmlich geregelt werden. Hierüber sowie über eine Änderung einer bestehenden Regelung hat das Gericht auf Antrag, soweit erforderlich auch von Amts wegen, zu entscheiden. Eltern und Kind haben alles zu unterlassen, was das Verhältnis des Kindes zu den anderen oben genannten Personen beeinträchtigt oder die Wahrnehmung von deren Aufgaben erschwert. Die Regelung soll die besondere Beziehung zwischen Eltern und Kind wahren und nach Möglichkeit sowohl die Freizeit als auch die Alltagsbetreuung erfassen.

(2) Das Gericht hat nötigenfalls die persönlichen Kontakte einzuschränken oder zu untersagen, insbesondere soweit dies aufgrund der Anwendung von Gewalt gegen das Kind oder eine wichtige Bezugsperson geboten erscheint, oder wenn der nicht hauptsächlich betreuende Elternteil seine Pflichten nach § 159 verletzt.

English working translation

§ 159 ABGB — Duty of cooperative conduct

In exercising the rights and fulfilling the duties under this Chapter, in order to safeguard the welfare of the child, everything must be refrained from that impairs the minor's relationship with other persons to whom rights and duties concerning the child are conferred under this Chapter, or that hinders the performance of their tasks.

§ 187 ABGB — Right to personal contact

(1) The child and each parent have the right to regular personal contact appropriate to the needs of the child. Personal contact shall be regulated by mutual agreement. On this, and on any modification of an existing arrangement, the court shall decide on application or, where necessary, of its own motion. Parents and child must refrain from anything that impairs the child's relationship with the other above-mentioned persons or that hinders the performance of their tasks. The arrangement shall preserve the special relationship between parents and child and, so far as possible, cover both leisure time and everyday care.

(2) Where necessary, the court shall restrict or prohibit personal contact, in particular where this appears called for by the application of violence against the child or against an important reference person, or where the non-primary-caregiving parent breaches his or her duties under § 159.

Why this matters for PA

  • § 159 is the statutory anchor for Austrian Entfremdung jurisprudence. Where a parent engages in alienating conduct — disparagement, contact-frustration, false allegations, blocking communication — the conduct breaches the Wohlverhaltensgebot directly. The breach is operative without requiring proof of the syndromal construct of PAS; § 159 turns on conduct and impairment to the child's relationship, not on diagnostic categorisation.
  • § 187 (1) Satz 4 — the duty applies to BOTH the parent AND the child. Distinctively, the Austrian formulation extends the cooperative-conduct duty to the child: "Eltern und Kind haben alles zu unterlassen, was das Verhältnis des Kindes zu den anderen oben genannten Personen beeinträchtigt." This is the legislative recognition that a child mobilised within an alienating dynamic is itself participating in the impairment — and that the proper response is structural intervention rather than ratifying the child's expressed refusal. The Oberster Gerichtshof has treated this clause as foundational in Kontaktverweigerung cases.
  • § 187 (2) — the dual-trigger enforcement mechanism. The court must (not may) restrict or prohibit contact (a) where violence is established OR (b) where the non-primary-caregiving parent breaches § 159. In Austrian PA litigation, the principal application is (b): a parent who alienates breaches § 159, and § 187 (2) is the enforcement hook for contact restriction. Note the asymmetry: only the non-primary-caregiving parent's § 159 breach is mentioned as a contact-restriction ground — but the Cassazione/OGH has reasoned-by-extension to apply the framework to the primary caregiver's alienating conduct via the structural §§ 138 + 159 Kindeswohl provisions.
  • Parallel with German § 1684 (2) BGB. The Austrian Wohlverhaltensgebot is virtually identical in scope to the German Wohlverhaltensklausel in § 1684 (2) BGB. Both impose the affirmative duty to refrain from impairing the child's relationship with the other parent. The structural difference: Austria addresses this in a standalone provision (§ 159 — applies broadly to all parental-responsibility rights/duties); Germany embeds it within the contact-right provision (§ 1684 (2) — operates as a sub-clause of the contact framework).
  • No SAP/PAS adoption. Austria has not adopted the syndromal framework. The OGH treats Entfremdung as a pattern of conduct triggering § 159 + § 187 (2) analysis, not as a diagnostic category. This is doctrinally significant: alienating-conduct findings rest on observable behaviour and child-welfare impact, not on disputed psychiatric nosology.

Procedural application

  • The competent court is the Bezirksgericht (district court) sitting as Pflegschaftsgericht (guardianship court); proceedings follow the Außerstreitgesetz (AußStrG) non-contentious framework.
  • Familiengerichtshilfe (family-court support service) provides multidisciplinary assessment in contested cases — the equivalent of CAFCASS in England & Wales. Familiengerichtshilfe assessment is the principal evidential pathway for § 159 breach findings.
  • Where § 187 (2) restriction is ordered, the typical structure is: supervised contact (begleitete Kontakte) for a transitional period → unsupervised contact subject to Erziehungsberatung (parenting counselling) → restoration of standard contact subject to demonstrated compliance.
  • Mediation is available but not mandatory; Erziehungsberatung (parenting counselling) is often court-ordered under § 107 AußStrG.

Use in alienating-conduct cases

The OGH has applied §§ 159 + 187 (2) to alienating-conduct patterns including: - Kontaktverweigerung (contact refusal) where the primary-caregiving parent fails to facilitate handovers - Schlechtmacherei (disparagement) — sustained negative messaging about the other parent - Indoktrination (indoctrination) — instructing the child to refuse contact - Loyalitätskonflikt-Instrumentalisierung — exploiting the child's loyalty conflict - Falsche Beschuldigungen (false allegations) — unfounded abuse allegations as contact-blocking tool

The remedy ladder is graduated: § 107 AußStrG (mediation/counselling order) → § 187 (2) ABGB (contact restriction directed at the alienating parent) → § 181 ABGB (Obsorge transfer, i.e. custody transfer to the targeted parent in severe cases).

Cross-reference

Sources & authoritative references

Topic baseline (independently verifiable):