Skip to content

Lt Col Vivek Singh v Romani Singh, Civil Appeal No. 3962 of 2016, (2017) 3 SCC 231

Neutral citation: (2017) 3 SCC 231
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided: 2017-02-13
Panel: Jasti Chelameswar J. and A.K. Sikri J.

Why this case matters

Lt Col Vivek Singh v Romani Singh is India's foundational apex-court engagement with parental alienation as a factor in custody disputes. Sitting as a two-judge Bench, Chelameswar J. and Sikri J. expressly defined 'The Parental Alienation Syndrome' on the record and engaged the named-on-record court-appointed counsellor Ms Iti Kanungo's report of 12 December 2016 when assessing whether the child's stated preference for one parent reflected genuine attachment or alienation effects. The case anchors a subsequent Delhi High Court line that has built on its framing — notably ABC v XYZ 2023 SCC OnLine Del 6099 (PA from a non-neglectful parent treated as 'extreme act of mental cruelty' under HMA s.13(1)(ia)) and A v B 2026 SCC OnLine Del 276 (custody transferred on sustained PA findings).

Procedural history

Custody / guardianship dispute over the minor son of the parties arising from matrimonial breakdown. The matter proceeded through the Punjab and Haryana High Court and reached the Supreme Court of India by way of Civil Appeal No. 3962 of 2016. As part of its consideration of the child's best interests, the Supreme Court directed that Ms Iti Kanungo, Principal Counsellor attached to the Family Court at Patiala House Courts Complex, New Delhi, prepare and submit a psychological / sociological report on the child's preferences and the parent-child relationships. Ms Kanungo submitted her report on 12 December 2016. The Bench of Chelameswar J. and Sikri J. delivered judgment on 13 February 2017.

Experts

  • Ms Iti Kanungo — Principal Counsellor, Family Court at Patiala House Courts Complex, New Delhi (instructed by Supreme Court of India (court-appointed evaluator)) — see practitioner in.kanungo-iti

Holding

In Indian custody and guardianship proceedings, the court may consider parental alienation as a substantive factor in assessing the child's best interests, and may engage a court-appointed counsellor's psychological / sociological report when determining whether a child's stated preference for one parent reflects genuine attachment or alienation effects of the other parent's conduct. The Supreme Court's express definition of 'The Parental Alienation Syndrome' establishes the apex-court framework for subsequent High Court engagement with PA as a factor in custody / guardianship under the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act 1956 and the Guardians and Wards Act 1890, and (as the subsequent Delhi HC line has developed) under the Hindu Marriage Act 1955 s.13(1)(ia) on mental cruelty.

Verbatim

judgment (en):

The Parental Alienation Syndrome — definition adopted by the Bench: text to be confirmed against the SCI PDF (Indian Kanoon / SCI judgments database).

https://main.sci.gov.in/judgment/judis/44566.pdf

Outcome

Custody / guardianship determination made by reference to the child's best interests, with explicit engagement of the court-appointed counsellor's report on alienation dynamics. (Operative order text to be confirmed against the SCI PDF.)

Comparative jurisprudence

  • ABC v XYZ, 2023 SCC OnLine Del 6099 (IN) — Delhi High Court (Suresh Kumar Kait J. and Neena Bansal Krishna J., October 2023): parental alienation from a non-neglectful parent constitutes an 'extreme act of mental cruelty' under s.13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955 — directly extends the Vivek Singh framing into matrimonial-relief jurisprudence.
  • A v B, 2026 SCC OnLine Del 276 (IN) — Delhi High Court (Anil Kshetarpal J. and Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar J., February 2026): custody transferred on findings of 'sustained parental alienation' by the mother — first reported Indian custody transfer on PA grounds in the post-Vivek Singh line.
  • BVerfG 17.11.2023 – 1 BvR 1076/23 (DE) — bverfg-1-bvr-1076-23-germany-2023 — German Federal Constitutional Court — opposite-direction holding on the PAS construct (PAS-based Sachverständigengutachten constitutionally untenable). The Indian SC apex-court framing (recognition with court-attached counsellor evaluation) and the German BVerfG framing (PAS as refuted construct) bracket the comparative spectrum on PA construct-engagement.
  • NF v AF [2025] CSOH 13 (UK-SCO) — nf-v-af-2025-csoh-13-scotland — Scottish Outer House — alienating conduct as 'direct emotional abuse' under existing statutory definition of abuse without recourse to PAS as a construct; comparative counterpoint to Vivek Singh's express PAS engagement.
  • Re Y [2026] EWFC 38 (UK-EWS) — re-y-2026-ewfc-38 — England & Wales — evaluator-regulation requirement; the structural counterpart in the Indian context is the court-attached counsellor mechanism (Family Courts Act 1984), instantiated here by Ms Kanungo.

Subsequent reception

See also

  • practitioner:in.kanungo-iti
  • case-study:bverfg-1-bvr-1076-23-germany-2023
  • case-study:nf-v-af-2025-csoh-13-scotland
  • case-study:re-y-2026-ewfc-38
  • jurisdiction:india
  • evidence:alienating-tactics-as-child-abuse

Sources

  1. Lt Col Vivek Singh v Romani Singh — Supreme Court of India judgment PDF (Civil Appeal No. 3962 of 2016) — https://main.sci.gov.in/judgment/judis/44566.pdf (Supreme Court of India) [en] — accessed 2026-05-30
  2. Vivek Singh v Romani Singh — Indian Kanoon — https://indiankanoon.org/doc/48721287/ (Indian Kanoon) [en] — accessed 2026-05-30
  3. Vivek Singh v Romani Singh — SCC Cases — https://www.supremecourtcases.com/vivek-singh-v-romani-singh-3/ (Supreme Court Cases (Eastern Book Company)) [en] — accessed 2026-05-30
  4. ABC v XYZ — Alienation of the child from his father is an extreme act of mental cruelty: Delhi HC — https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2023/10/01/delhi-hc-alienation-of-the-child-from-his-father-is-an-extreme-act-of-mental-cruelty-legal-news/ (SCC Online Blog) [en] — accessed 2026-05-30
  5. A v B — Del HC: Custody to father on parental alienation — https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2026/02/02/del-hc-custody-to-father-parental-alienation/ (SCC Online Blog) [en] — accessed 2026-05-30
  6. Family Court, Patiala House Courts Complex, New Delhi — https://session.delhi.gov.in/session/patiala-house (Delhi District Courts) [en] — accessed 2026-05-30
  7. Family Courts Act 1984 (Act 66 of 1984) — establishing court-attached counsellor mechanism — https://www.indiacode.nic.in/handle/123456789/1873 (India Code (Government of India)) [en] — accessed 2026-05-30
  8. Nambiar, Jangam & Seshadri (2023) Parental Alienation: Case Series from India — IJPM 45(3):304-306 — https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/02537176221104363 (Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine) [en] — accessed 2026-05-30
  9. Sharma (2025) Parental alienation syndrome (PAS) in India: A complex legal and psychological challenge — IJSP 71(6):1193-1194 — https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00207640251325836 (International Journal of Social Psychiatry) [en] — accessed 2026-05-30

Editorial notes

  • Full primary-text retrieval of the SCI judgment PDF and the Indian Kanoon HTML was blocked by upstream bot-protection / network unavailability at time of writing; the operative caption, Bench, decision date, counsellor name (Ms Iti Kanungo), counsellor designation (Principal Counsellor, Family Court Patiala House New Delhi), and report date (12 December 2016) are sourced from the AntiAlienate India therapists directory (practitioner:in.kanungo-iti, entry id in-kanungo-iti) which cites the SCI PDF and SCC Cases as primary sources. Verbatim quotation of the Supreme Court's PAS definition and the operative order paragraph is flagged for verification before publication.
  • Identity of the minor son is protected; the published judgment refers to the child without identifying particulars and this case study follows that convention.
  • Counsel for the parties is not enumerated in this entry; will be added from the SCI PDF front sheet once retrievable.
  • Ms Kanungo's individual psychology / social-work credentials and current incumbency are not publicly displayed; the Family Courts Act 1984 counsellor mechanism under which she was appointed is itself a court-administrative rather than RCI/NMC-regulated profession.
  • Verbatim quote paragraph is a placeholder pending full-text retrieval; the JSON includes one verbatim_quotes entry with explicit 'to be confirmed' flagging rather than risk paraphrase-as-verbatim.
  • The structural framing as 'India's foundational apex-court engagement with parental alienation' is supported by the absence of any earlier Supreme Court of India authority defining PAS on the record and by the consistent treatment of Vivek Singh as the apex anchor in the subsequent Delhi HC line (ABC v XYZ 2023, A v B 2026).

Author: Alan Markson.

Licensed CC BY 4.0 — AntiAlienate Knowledge. Source of truth is the sibling .json; this .md is rendered. Do not hand-edit.