Skip to content

Brazil — Lei nº 12.318/2010 (Lei da Alienação Parental)

TL;DR. Brazil's 2010 federal statute that explicitly codified parental alienation as a statutory category — the first major national-level statute of its kind. Defines alienating behaviors, authorizes specific remedies, and establishes a tiered response framework for Brazilian family courts. Internationally cited as evidence that legislative recognition of PA is workable + has produced functioning case-law in practice over 15+ years.

Maintained by Alan Markson · Last reviewed: 2026-05-17 · License: CC BY 4.0

Citation

Lei nº 12.318, de 26 de agosto de 2010 — Dispõe sobre a alienação parental e altera o art. 236 da Lei nº 8.069, de 13 de julho de 1990 (Estatuto da Criança e do Adolescente).

What the law does

Article 2 — Statutory definition of "alienação parental"

"Considera-se ato de alienação parental a interferência na formação psicológica da criança ou do adolescente promovida ou induzida por um dos genitores, pelos avós ou pelos que tenham a criança ou adolescente sob a sua autoridade, guarda ou vigilância para que repudie genitor ou que cause prejuízo ao estabelecimento ou à manutenção de vínculos com este."

Translation: Acts of parental alienation are defined as interference with the psychological formation of the child or adolescent — promoted or induced by one parent, grandparents, or those with authority over the child — to cause repudiation of a parent or harm to the parent-child bond.

Article 2 (sole paragraph) — Examples of alienating conduct

The statute lists 7 examples of alienating behaviors (analogous to Baker's 8 indicators):

  1. Engaging in unjustified disqualifying campaign against the parent's conduct
  2. Obstructing the parent's exercise of parental authority
  3. Obstructing contact with the parent
  4. Obstructing the exercise of regulated family-life rights
  5. Omitting deliberately personal information to the parent (school, medical, address changes)
  6. Making false allegations against the parent
  7. Changing residence to distant locations without justification, to make contact difficult

Article 6 — Statutory remedies

When the judge identifies alienating behavior, available remedies include:

I. Declaration of alienating conduct + warning to the alienating parent II. Expanded visitation in favor of the targeted parent III. Imposition of fines (astreintes) IV. Mandatory psychological/biopsychosocial counseling V. Modification of custody (mudança de guarda) or imposition of shared custody VI. Determination of fixed residence of the child VII. Declaration of suspension of parental authority (suspensão da autoridade parental)

The tiered framework from warning → fines → counseling → custody change provides Brazilian judges a structured escalation path.

Significance internationally

Brazil's Lei 12.318 is significant for international PA jurisprudence because:

  1. It demonstrates statutory PA recognition is workable — over 15 years of case-law has developed without the predicted "weaponization" concerns
  2. It defines behaviors, not syndrome — anticipated the international convergence toward behavior-frame analysis
  3. It empowers but does not require courts — judges retain discretion; statute is permissive, not mandatory
  4. It became a model for other Latin American statutory frameworks — Mexico, Argentina, Peru have considered similar approaches

Critiques + debate

The Brazilian PA statute has been subject to ongoing political debate. Critics argue:

  • Risk of weaponization in abuse-allegation cases (similar to Re H-N concerns in UK)
  • Periodic legislative-revision attempts have been considered
  • Some Brazilian feminist legal scholars argue for stricter abuse-allegation pathways

Defenders point to:

  • 15 years of functioning case-law has developed clear distinctions
  • Brazilian appellate courts have consistently rejected alienation findings where abuse is substantiated
  • The statute itself requires the conduct to be unjustified — i.e., does not apply where the rejected parent's conduct is actually harmful

The international PA-academic consensus (Bernet 2010, Harman et al. 2018) generally favors the Brazilian approach as having found workable balance over time.

Practical use

For international litigation involving Brazilian children/parents:

  • Brazilian children located abroad: Lei 12.318 informs the home-jurisdiction context
  • Cross-border Hague cases involving Brazil: Brazil is a Hague signatory; the statute's behaviors-framework informs evaluator analysis
  • Comparative-law arguments in other jurisdictions: Lei 12.318 demonstrates that statutory PA recognition is implementable

Citing posts

# Post
18 https://www.antialienate.com/blog/pa-cross-cultural
62 https://www.antialienate.com/blog/parental-alienation-scope-history-future

Primary source

  • Planalto: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2007-2010/2010/Lei/L12318.htm
  • Brazilian Senate database: https://www25.senado.leg.br/web/atividade/materias/-/materia/96018

Disclaimer

Wiki entry, not legal advice. Brazilian PA matters require qualified advogado de família.

CC BY 4.0 · antialienate.com